ISC Connection

Posted: December 6, 2010 in ISC Topic

Tiger Woods. Needless to say everyone remembers what he did over one year ago. It was on  all the news even ESPN, and Woods was a humiliated person. Many of his endorsements were dropped and not one company wanted to associate with him. Crisis Management comes into play here, he covered many of the other steps like accepting the blame, but he did not apologize. If Woods apologized maybe some would forgive him, maybe some would say alright he did something wrong but he said he was sorry. By not apologizing Woods made him self look like a man who just did not care. What do you think? Would apologizing make event the slightest difference in this mans public light?

Comments
  1. joshkane17 says:

    If Tiger Woods apologized, it may have made a difference. If Woods came off remorseful, regretful, and sincere more of the public would of been quicker to forgive Woods. The fact that he did admit mistakes but not apologize stuck out to the public. Anything following the story noticed “something was missing”?. The apology…say your sorry! or at least pretend to be. Not apologizing only gives people something else to think about. In class we learned that during crisis management it is important to release everything as soon as possible. This allows all the information to be present, everything is on the table. For the past year, new information seldomly continues to surface on the Tiger Woods story. The continuing surface of information is a reason why people are still talking about it. To properly move on, information cannot continue arise. I believe it’s too late now for Woods to apologize, he’s already missed the boat. If Woods was to now apologize, his sincerity would be in question.

Leave a comment